Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Sep 1999 09:45:58 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Eric J. Schwertfeger" <ejs@bfd.com>
To:        Forrest Aldrich <forrie@forrie.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: IPFW and PortSentry
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9909130944270.14975-100000@harlie.bfd.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19990913115244.00b08ee0@216.67.12.69>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, Forrest Aldrich wrote:

> I've noticed that the program PortSentry will use "ipfw add 1" in its trigger mechanism,
> which I'm not sure is appropriate -- if you already had a rule 1 in there, the results
> of trying to add another 1 (I've not tested it) are unknown.

Actually, that behavior is appropriate, as per the man page "Multiple 
rules may share the same number and apply in the order in which they were
added."



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9909130944270.14975-100000>