Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2002 16:02:47 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: not on list - please copy <hackers@freebsd.org>, current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, n0go013 <ttz@blahdeblah.demon.co.uk>, Lars Eggert <larse@ISI.EDU>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost Message-ID: <XFMail.20021004160247.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210041242410.17529-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04-Oct-2002 Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <3D9DE0D0.4050204@isi.edu>, Lars Eggert writes: >> >This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. >> > >> >--------------ms040706010906030302070807 >> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed >> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> > >> >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> >> >> I would need to look at the code to be able to tell, I don't have >> >> time for that. >> > >> >I'd consider not having vinum work under geom a show-stopper... at least >> >until geom can stripe. >> >> Well, the showstopper is in vinum. The fact that ccd(4) works >> seamlessly with GEOM is testament to this. >> >> There are numerous architectural issues which have never been >> fixed in vinum, and one or more of these bits now. >> >> Whoever loves vinum will have to chase it/them down and fix it. > > No, it is established principal tha the importer of new features has the > responsibility to make older subsystems work. Oh, you mean like KSE on Alpha? -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20021004160247.jhb>