Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:24:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@xyz.csail.mit.edu> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: ports/179313: ruby 1.9.3.429 disagrees with bsd.ruby.mk Message-ID: <201306042024.r54KOjo0041008@xyz.csail.mit.edu> Resent-Message-ID: <201306042030.r54KU1UJ033127@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 179313 >Category: ports >Synopsis: ruby 1.9.3.429 disagrees with bsd.ruby.mk >Confidential: no >Severity: critical >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Jun 04 20:30:00 UTC 2013 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Garrett Wollman >Release: FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p2 amd64 >Organization: MIT Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory >Environment: System: FreeBSD xyz.csail.mit.edu 9.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p2 #27 r250065M: Mon Apr 29 17:11:15 EDT 2013 wollman@xyz.csail.mit.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CSAIL amd64 >Description: bsd.ruby.mk thinks that RUBY_ARCH should be "amd64-freebsd9". However, the latest lang/ruby19 installs things in "x86_64-freebsd9". The result is an unusable package with architecture-dependent files missing. >How-To-Repeat: poudriere testport ... -o lang/ruby19 Extracts from the build logs: ./miniruby -I./lib -I. -I.ext/common ./tool/rbinstall.rb --make="make" --dest-dir="" --extout=".ext" --mflags="" --make-flags=" ARCH=amd64 OPSYS=FreeBSD OSREL=9.1 OSVERSION=901000 SYSTEMVERSION=" --data-mode=0644 --prog-mode=0755 --installed-list .installed.list --mantype="doc" --install=all --rdoc-output=".ext/rdoc" installing binary commands: /prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/bin installing base libraries: /prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/lib installing arch files: /prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/lib/ruby/1.9/x86_64-freebsd9 installing pkgconfig data: /prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/libdata/pkgconfig installing extension objects: /prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/lib/ruby/1.9/x86_64-freebsd9 installing extension objects: /prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9/x86_64-freebsd9 installing extension objects: /prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9/x86_64-freebsd9 installing extension headers: /prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/include/ruby-1.9//x86_64-freebsd9 .... pkg-static: lstat(/prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/include/ruby-1.9/amd64-freebsd9/ruby/config.h): No such file or directory pkg-static: DEVELOPER_MODE: Plist error, missing file: include/ruby-1.9/amd64-freebsd9/ruby/config.h pkg-static: lstat(/prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/include/ruby-1.9/amd64-freebsd9/ruby/): No such file or directory pkg-static: DEVELOPER_MODE: Plist error: @dirrm include/ruby-1.9/amd64-freebsd9/ruby pkg-static: lstat(/prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/include/ruby-1.9/amd64-freebsd9/): No such file or directory pkg-static: DEVELOPER_MODE: Plist error: @dirrm include/ruby-1.9/amd64-freebsd9 pkg-static: lstat(/prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/lib/ruby/1.9/amd64-freebsd9/bigdecimal.so): No such file or directory pkg-static: DEVELOPER_MODE: Plist error, missing file: lib/ruby/1.9/amd64-freebsd9/bigdecimal.so pkg-static: lstat(/prefix/ruby-1.9.3.429_1/lib/ruby/1.9/amd64-freebsd9/continuation.so): No such file or directory ... >Fix: Don't know -- do we want to follow Ruby here or do we want to hack Ruby to use the same name as we do? Where is Ruby even doing this? >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201306042024.r54KOjo0041008>