Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:24:18 +0000 From: "Luiz Gustavo S. Costa" <luizgustavo@luizgustavo.pro.br> To: Chris Buechler <cbuechler@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rdr + reply-to, some solution ? Message-ID: <AANLkTilsfgvw5MY98y2QxW_D5KuaUVqTPkRDFXKmy_Gl@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikwp2exi_fDniASauaPpEGX8FfgahZwRTlDmLUj@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTimQDT9IOfmNxAJSzGRj3TCmtKNso8hqLXFQebLr@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikwp2exi_fDniASauaPpEGX8FfgahZwRTlDmLUj@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi Chris ! how are you? as it says here in Brazil: "I eat ball" :). pass in $if_int reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.100 port 80 but still, the combination does not work thanks 2010/6/28 Chris Buechler <cbuechler@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa > <luizgustavo@luizgustavo.pro.br> wrote: >> Hi all. >> >> I know there is a problem in using rdr with the reply-to, I usually >> use some software to "rdr", as the rinetd, but it's not a pretty >> solution. >> >> Is there any alternative? >> >> Below is an example of what I'm talking about. >> >> # Nat section >> rdr on $if_ext2 proto tcp from any to 200.x.x.x port 80 -> 192.168.1.100 >> # Rules section >> pass in $if_ext2 reply-to ($if_ext2 $gw_ext2) proto tcp from any to >> 200.x.x.x port 80 >> > > That rule won't match traffic from that rdr. The dest has to be the > 192.168.1.100 IP. > -- Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD) *+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+ mundoUnix - Consultoria em Software Livre http://www.mundounix.com.br ICQ: 2890831 / MSN: contato@mundounix.com.br Tel: 55 (21) 2642-3799 / 7582-0594 Blog: http://www.luizgustavo.pro.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTilsfgvw5MY98y2QxW_D5KuaUVqTPkRDFXKmy_Gl>