Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:15:30 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include/arpa inet.h src/sys/netinet in.h src Message-ID: <200103240814.f2O8EJf62071@gratis.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103241848410.26437-100000@besplex.bde.org> ; from Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> "Sat, 24 Mar 2001 19:04:24 %2B1100." References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103241848410.26437-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> wollman once objected to using it there. I don't remember why, but > it may have been because these types are misspellings of uint32_t, > etc. ipv4 addresses have precisely 32 bits, so using an opaque type > for them can be considered bogus. Also, in_addr_t is a bogus name. > Only ipv4 internet address fit in it. Using in_addr_t and in_port_t will give us a high degree of code compatability with OpenBSD. This is very desirable, as I want to borg their sys/crypto. M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103240814.f2O8EJf62071>