Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:59:49 -0500 From: Bart Silverstrim <bsilver@chrononomicon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: hyper threading. Message-ID: <c241543ff80de31bf55064c8a610e1ed@chrononomicon.com> In-Reply-To: <8C7006AE7E80573-FAC-3B652@mblk-r28.sysops.aol.com> References: <c6ef380c050326061976f164b@mail.gmail.com> <1641928994.20050326192811@wanadoo.fr> <8C700529A2DFD74-A44-3A157@mblk-d34.sysops.aol.com> <439876144.20050326220638@wanadoo.fr> <8C7006AE7E80573-FAC-3B652@mblk-r28.sysops.aol.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 26, 2005, at 5:33 PM, em1897@aol.com wrote: > Yes, the theory is very nice; you've done a nice > job reading Intel's marketing garb. What theory? All I see is "On Mar 26, 2005, at 5:33 PM, em1897@aol.com wrote:"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c241543ff80de31bf55064c8a610e1ed>