Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:11:59 -0500 From: michael <michael.copeland@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors Message-ID: <4942D39F.7010704@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20081212210216.GC37185@kokopelli.hydra> References: <20081211190951.GB845@comcast.net> <20081211113257.405a082c@gom.home> <20081211202023.GC845@comcast.net> <20081211134622.15c81ecd@gom.home> <20081212002813.GD32300@kokopelli.hydra> <20081211170011.777236f8@gom.home> <20081212015814.GB32982@kokopelli.hydra> <20081211215036.526b2cad@gom.home> <20081212181148.GD36348@kokopelli.hydra> <20081212191512.G4492@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081212210216.GC37185@kokopelli.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chad Perrin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 07:15:35PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>> cropping up and saying the equivalent of "If we work on that stuff, >>> FreeBSD will just become MS Windows, and it'll suck." I disagree with >>> >> because linux got exactly that way and it sucks now. >> > > Are you reading this, prad? > > i've forgotten what the original topic of this post is... on a side note, aix ftw.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4942D39F.7010704>