Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 21:41:08 -0700 From: Doug Hardie <bc979@lafn.org> To: Shaun Amott <shaun@inerd.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qpopper Message-ID: <F7491A0C-F9B9-4A69-931F-B38A2B03EDAE@lafn.org> In-Reply-To: <20060513042230.GA2204@picobyte.net> References: <B6A18E1A-CA88-45FC-8A6C-D2324973324F@lafn.org> <20060513022617.GC960@picobyte.net> <3CDD7B72-34FC-45C2-828F-2F9F9C9FCD0F@lafn.org> <20060513042230.GA2204@picobyte.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 12, 2006, at 21:22, Shaun Amott wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 09:03:04PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote: >> >>> The port is assigned to the default ports@ address (pointed at this >>> list), so it is currently not maintained. >> >> Interesting as that is not identified on the qualcomm web pages. I >> saw a reference to 4.1.0 and went digging through the qualcomm ftp >> site. Found 4.1a2 in the beta directory. Its dated last summer. >> It does have the code for the homedir issues in it. 4.0.9 did not. >> What is the status of the port going to be with no one assigned to >> it? >> > > The port is unlikely to get updated, unless someone notices it and > decides to look into it. > > If you feel you could take responsibility for the port, then feel free > to submit a patch and offer to maintain it. In this case, you'll > want to > have a read of the Porter's Handbook first (easily found on Google). I will look through the Porter's Handbood again. Didn't understand it on quick read a few weeks ago. Is this the right place to ask about the porting process?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F7491A0C-F9B9-4A69-931F-B38A2B03EDAE>