Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 21:32:29 +0100 From: ian j hart <ianjhart@ntlworld.com> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "stable@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: RELENG_4_3 calls itself -RELEASE? Message-ID: <3B6B0A5D.D87277FF@ntlworld.com> References: <01080304302005.00395@spatula.home> <200108031605.f73G5bH65372@harmony.village.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20010803110818.021f6470@pop.schulte.org> <20010803125928M.jkh@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > From: Christopher Schulte <christopher@schulte.org> > Subject: Re: RELENG_4_3 calls itself -RELEASE? > Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 11:10:07 -0500 > > > I believe Kris Kennaway made a post yesterday explaining it would be called > > 4.3-SECURITY, or 4.4-SECURITY after 4.4-RELEASE. > > > > Waiting approval from jkh? > > I think that implies a degree of committment which Kris, despite his > very best intentions, probably can't actually fulfill. People assume > quite a bit with respect to branches. > > I'm sold on either 4.4-BEET or 4.4-POSTRELEASE as a name for the > branch. Neither one really implies very much that isn't obvious in > the name itself. If reasoned argument doesn't cut it I'll just have to invoke an ancient British playground tradition. BAGS I SECURITY. ;) AFAICT I was the first to propose a change. Yes you can blame me! But seriously folks, the security advisories are already using the 4.3-SECURITY terminology. I assumed it had been discussed internally. > > - Jordan > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- ian j hart To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B6B0A5D.D87277FF>