Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2000 12:00:21 -0500 (EST) From: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> To: (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: andreas@FreeBSD.ORG, se@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Qt/KDE/bsd.port.mk upgrade PRs imminent Message-ID: <XFMail.000108120021.andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> In-Reply-To: <vqcr9ftc4gb.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08-Jan-00 Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > Why not "qt144"? I think the Qt tradition of having all version > numbers so we can have both versions in the tree at the same time > while we switch over is worth preserving. Because Qt 1.44 is compatible with all previous versions of Qt 1.4x? Seems like it would "replace" them. I think it would be easier to upgrade Qt 1.x later on, should Troll Tech ever decide t orelease any further versions. -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000108120021.andrews>