Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:46:44 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why would a port use its own existence as an excuse to fail install? Message-ID: <20140216114644.78bcbba8@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20140216033119.GR22007@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20140216033119.GR22007@albert.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 19:31:19 -0800 David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> wrote: > Silly me -- I thought today might be a good day to upgrade X.org on my > laptop to the NEW_XORG. > yes, Saturdays are good days for updates. > >====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) ===> Installing > >ldconfig configuration file ===> Installing for qt4-clucene-4.8.5 > >===> Registering installation for qt4-clucene-4.8.5 Installing > >qt4-clucene-4.8.5...pkg-static: qt4-clucene-4.8.5 conflicts with > >qt4-clucene-4.8.5 (installs files into the same place). Problematic > >file: /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtCLucene.la *** [fake-pkg] Error code 70 > Cool! > Eventually, it will probably become moot, as I'll (eventually) Before you do this switch to svn and portupgrade. > migrate to stable/10, and go through the deinstall-all-ports, then > reinstall-all-ports exercise.... but, seriously...? What's causing > this? Even this exercise can be done with svn and portupgrade. I use portupgrade since many years. It was hard at the beginning but it did not leave me with an machine I could not use anymore. Ok, it does not upgrade the affected ports then but I still can use the machine. Instruct it to make backup packages of the installed ports and you should be real save. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140216114644.78bcbba8>