Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 12:48:04 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> To: Paolo Pisati <piso@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw initialization: SI_ORDER_ANY -> SI_ORDER_MIDDLE? Message-ID: <20080303114804.GA46175@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <20080303101718.GA34056@tin.it> References: <20080302144939.GA23353@tin.it> <20080302145850.GA33308@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20080303101718.GA34056@tin.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:17:19AM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 03:58:50PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > The SI_ORDER_* definitions in /sys/sys/kernel.h are enumerated on a > > large range, so if the existing code does not have races, > > you can safely move the non-leaf modules > > (such as ipfw,ko in your case) to (SI_ORDER_ANY - some_small_integer) > > without breaking anything. > > fine, i did this. > > is it MFCable? i think so, the SI_ORDER_* definitions are the same at least down to RELENG_6, which is the lowest release we probably care about. cheers luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080303114804.GA46175>