Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:24:29 -0400
From:      Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com>
To:        Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: vim question...
Message-ID:  <4ad871310906142024i70597c40udad1dab11197cc4b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090615031831.GA33450@thought.org>
References:  <20090615024643.GA33420@thought.org> <4ad871310906142000x6515bdau8020dafce579745e@mail.gmail.com> <20090615031831.GA33450@thought.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Gary Kline<kline@thought.org> wrote:
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0hi glenn,

One 'n'. :)

>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0yeah, i read the recent posts about the key binding and vi=
m;
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0that's what brought my question to the fore. =A0i did read=
 on the
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0evolution list that a gvim plugin may happen. =A0the main =
reason i
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0use mutt is that my fingers know vi. =A0unfortunately, the=
re're too

I use mutt because "it sucks less", quoting the author.

> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0many things in email now that require a gui reader. =A0be =
nice to
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0be able to read in evo and if i had to reply, use gvim.
>

Hmm.... Well, for what it's worth, I didn't even know *vi* had an
'undo' option.  I thought that was what 'q!' was for. :)

I'm as interested as you are now.

--=20
Glen Barber



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ad871310906142024i70597c40udad1dab11197cc4b>