Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:13:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl@univie.ac.at> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please help me tune FreeBSD for bulk.fefe.de/scalability/ Message-ID: <20031024201256.G43805-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <20031025010928.V846@korben.in.tern>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Felix von Leitner wrote: > > > Please also tell me if you have suggestions for other benchmarks that > > say something about the scalability of an operating system, that I could > > (and should) include in my benchmark suite. > > If you have some spare time, I'd really be interested in how the new > SCHED_ULE scheduler compares against the traditional (default) SCHED_4BSD > scheduler (although SCHED_ULE has been designed for SMP, some UP results > are sure nice to have). ULE has developed some performance problems. I'm not sure where they came from but I will be working on it in the next few weeks. Until then I wouldn't recommend any benchmarking with it unless the CPU affinity will really be a huge win. > > Regarding performance tuning: did you already look at accf_http(9) and/or > accf_data(9)? (Although it would probably need some rewrite of your > code...) > > regards, > le > > -- > Lukas Ertl eMail: l.ertl@univie.ac.at > UNIX Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073 > Vienna University Computer Center Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140 > University of Vienna http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031024201256.G43805-100000>