Date: Tue, 4 Jul 1995 21:44:27 +0900 (JST) From: Atsushi Murai <amurai@spec.co.jp> To: davidg@Root.com, jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: another reason not to change 0.0.0.0 into 192.0.0.1 in PPP Message-ID: <199507041244.VAA00811@tama.spec.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199507040558.WAA09206@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Jul 3, 95 10:58:16 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> NIC.NORDU.NET internet address = 192.36.148.17 > NS.ISC.ORG internet address = 192.5.5.241 > > > > Need I say more? :-) > > -DG Oops I just miss reading your mail. I just want to say I don't need example for "192.0.0.1" as I mentioned prvious my mail. But I still need to response/comments/disc ussion for relating you did for ppp. We should investgate this problem as two issue. First of all. I guss the using "0.0.0.0" ip addr is OK not for dial on demand mode. Because it's never seen as ip address befor connection made. But for dail on demand mode, it's can see one of real address. So I beleive we should assign a private address (RFC1579) avoiding confliction in world. Second. I couldn't understand why James ISP's PPP never try to negotiate his specified address unless using magic "0.0.0.0" address. I think it's wrong implementation but if it is getting one of *standard*, I have idea to do a trick and do a right commit :-) Atsushi. P.S. James, Could you send me your ppp.log both "0.0.0.0" and "192.0.0.1" ? -- Atsushi Murai Internet: amurai@spec.co.jp System Planning and Engineering Co,.Ltd. Voice : +81-33833-5341
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507041244.VAA00811>