Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 04:56:04 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de> Cc: Stephen.Clark@seclark.us, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.9 losing mbufs!!! Message-ID: <20060418185604.GA694@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <44451A54.1080509@gmx.de> References: <4444EE93.9050003@seclark.us> <20060418143122.GB76356@home.c0mplx.org> <44450BFB.1090705@seclark.us> <44451A54.1080509@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2006-Apr-18 18:56:52 +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >4.9 and 4.11 are on the same branch, thus of course, userland programs >don't require recompilation. "shouldn't" not "don't". This would still require regression testing to confirm that nothing breaks. Given that Steve has stated that he intends to migrate to 6.1 shortly, he probably wants to avoid an unnecessary round of regression testing. -- Peter Jeremy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060418185604.GA694>