Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:54:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Frank Bonnet <f.bonnet@esiee.fr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Michael David Crawford <mdc@prgmr.com> Subject: Re: Need a filesystem with "unlimited" inodes Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0906110951430.22163@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <4A30B4A9.7070904@esiee.fr> References: <26face530906081813x5abd6d28i27137b76b0be41c@mail.gmail.com> <26face530906101559p28f4d56dl287d4b6026454d2b@mail.gmail.com> <4A308498.7090108@prgmr.com> <4A30862F.8050703@esiee.fr> <4A30934E.6000001@prgmr.com> <4A30B4A9.7070904@esiee.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >> Mike > > The only way to be sure is to test it , I've read at 7.2 it has reached > stability. As long as there is no recovery tool for ZFS it cannot be treated safe. In SUNs theory it just can't fail - which is nonsense unless machines are perfect and you'll never experience hardware problems. Not disk - but main computer (CPU, memory). It's similar to linux reiserfs i used long time ago. Well it had reiserfsck, but it should be called reiserdestroyfs :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0906110951430.22163>