Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 14:13:27 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com> Cc: virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limitations on jail style virtualization Message-ID: <4CDF0D87.70700@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=9ZA3rpofUriXc-b3kZQCyDNe%2BQQV00AvZ0Fhk@mail.gmail.com> References: <4CDEFC2D.4090908@freebsd.org> <AANLkTi=9ZA3rpofUriXc-b3kZQCyDNe%2BQQV00AvZ0Fhk@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/13/10 1:55 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Julian Elischer<julian@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Was this brought up in any of the discussions? > > http://www.7he.at/freebsd/vps/ no it was not brought up.. it was an unofficial non-planned discussion that errupted pretty much spontaneously an a couple of couches so it was not prepared in advance.. Since I don't know much about that project I didn't bring it up. However I should take the time to read it.. thanks for bringing it up! > I'm not sure if the VPS project pertains directly to what you're > talking about, but perhaps some of the code or ideas from the project > might? > > Even if it doesn't, it's still an exciting project that adds a ton of > value to FreeBSD's light-weight virtualization strategy. What do think > about the VPS concept in relation to the current virtualization effort > being put in to jails? It seems to me that recent efforts at > virtualizing kernel-level objects makes VPS the future of FreeBSD's > virtualization, leaving jails as a great way to isolate > applications... it the approaches are compatible I see no reason to not combine but I'll know more when I have read it. > -Brandon >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CDF0D87.70700>