Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:00:51 +0100
From:      RW <list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 5.x separate /boot slice?
Message-ID:  <200508042200.51875.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com>
In-Reply-To: <a0623094ebf178314f32a@[192.168.1.102]>
References:  <a0623094ebf178314f32a@[192.168.1.102]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 04 August 2005 09:49, Michael Dexter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to try a separate /boot slice as permitted by FreeBSD 5.x...
>
> (http://www.khmere.com/freebsd_book/html/ch08.html)
>
> But alas it does not appear to be as simple as simply specifying a
> /boot during setup. This causes the bootloader to complain about not
> finding a kernel given that /boot on the root partition is empty.
> Presumably this is too early in the boot process to link <root>/boot
> to the /boot slice given that the fstab has not been read yet.
>
> Any pointers on how to get this to work?
>
> Perhaps the boot loader needs to be pointed at the /boot slice rather
> than root and a "rootdev" variable fed into a specific loader stage?
> I'm not sure!

Search the list.  This comes up about once a month, and I've yet to see anyone 
succeed. 

Aside from "it's the way Linux does it", do you have any good reason for 
wanting this? 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508042200.51875.list-freebsd-2004>