Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:02:27 +0200
From:      Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
To:        Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com>
Cc:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org>, Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: allow ffs & co. a binary search
Message-ID:  <55C9BA23.10407@selasky.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150811100327.0d12231f@X220.alogt.com>
References:  <20150607081315.7c0f09fb@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> <5573EA5E.40806@selasky.org> <20150607195245.62dc191f@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> <20150607135453.GH2499@kib.kiev.ua> <558175FA.4040106@FreeBSD.org> <20150617165331.GA2080@kib.kiev.ua> <5582CCF1.8010505@FreeBSD.org> <55C335A7.8020503@selasky.org> <20150811100327.0d12231f@X220.alogt.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/11/15 04:03, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Why not detect the built-in functions and do the binary search when
> they are not available and leave the original implementation for all
> other sizes?

How can we detect this compile time?

--HPS



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55C9BA23.10407>