Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 21:01:40 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Peter Leftwich <Hostmaster@Video2Video.Com> Cc: Jeff Jirsa <jeff@unixconsults.com>, John Bleichert <syborg@stny.rr.com>, FreeBSD LIST <FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Editors (was Re: Is simplicity despised?) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0208062059290.33444-100000@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <20020806223420.F88874-100000@earl-grey.cloud9.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Peter Leftwich wrote: [lots of stuff trimmed] > Ah, I was going to say something similar applauding pico (tight, slight and > outta sight) and ee (commands are at the top in my case). But I did want > to add some comments. Pico does have just a few annoying default traits, > such as Ctrl-k chopping the entire line rather than what is to the right of > the cursor, and not having Suspend enabled. nano fixes many of the problems of pico, and it's GPLed. But why change something that isn't broken? This thread shows that most people will install their favorite editor as a matter of course. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0208062059290.33444-100000>