Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 08:34:20 -0500 From: Bill Vermillion <bv@wjv.com> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Router based on FreeBSD. Message-ID: <20011211083420.A80896@wjv.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112110400040.14453-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>; from forrestc@imach.com on Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 04:01:46AM -0700 References: <CA28026327658B478F964AD08A46D4130560CB@exch2k.stack.firm> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112110400040.14453-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 04:01:46AM -0700, Forrest W. Christian thus spoke: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Tolpanov, Dmitry wrote: > > > I've got a very complex problem so every advice is appreciated. > > I've got a router on 4.3-STABLE FreeBSD. It's got hardware (in short): > > - Intel Pentium III 500 MHz > > - NIC 3Com 10/100 in 100baseTX <full-duplex> > > - NIC 3Com 10/100 in 100baseTX <full-duplex> > > - NIC 3Com 10/100 in 100baseTX <full-duplex> > > - NIC 3Com 900 Combo 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> > > - NIC 3Com 900 Combo 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> > > > > Sometimes through this router network works slowly and it is natural > > right thing. Therefore we are going to split router on two. > Define slowly. Can you see added latency across the router? > Personally I'd switch all the cards out for Intel, but that is my > preference - and I can't say it would help at all. I prefer them too. However I wonder just what model numbers the above 3com cards are. Model number might have a bearing on this. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011211083420.A80896>