Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:48:26 -0700
From:      Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha interrupt.c src/sys/alpha/isa isa.c src/sys/amd64/amd64 intr_machdep.c src/sys/amd64/include intr_machdep.h src/sys/amd64/isa atpic.c src/sys/arm/arm intr.c src/sys/dev/sio sio.c src/sys/dev/uart uart_kbd_sun.c uart_tty.c ...
Message-ID:  <200510261648.27126.peter@wemm.org>
In-Reply-To: <200510261320.46985.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <200510251948.j9PJmmmj043891@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051025224540.GB4123@soaustin.net> <200510261320.46985.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 10:20 am, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 October 2005 06:45 pm, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 07:48:48PM +0000, John Baldwin wrote:
> > >   Reorganize the interrupt handling code a bit to make a few
> > > things cleaner and increase flexibility to allow various
> > > different approaches to be tried in the future.
> >
> > Wow.  Having (in a previous existance) worked on real-time OS
> > interrupt handlers I can likely guess how much work went into this.
> >  Nice.
>
> Actually, this diff wasn't a huge deal, it was mostly just a
> refactoring of what was already there.

Of course the real challenge is to make things like the puc device do 
the right thing automatically instead of needing 'options 
PUC_FASTINTR'.
-- 
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510261648.27126.peter>