Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:00:56 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Critical Sections for userland. Message-ID: <86ejgbqjvr.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20071004094821.GM31826@elvis.mu.org> (Alfred Perlstein's message of "Thu\, 4 Oct 2007 02\:48\:21 -0700") References: <20071003015231.GJ31826@elvis.mu.org> <86zlyzqmgo.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20071004094821.GM31826@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> writes: > Do you have: > > a) Evidence or a paper to prove that this is a bad idea? I need evidence or a paper to prove that it is a bad idea to allow a userland process to hold the CPU indefinitely? > b) A helpful suggestion? Why don't you tell us what you're actually trying to do, so we can tell you how to do it. > c) An obvious understanding of the problem? I'll show you mine if you show me yours. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ejgbqjvr.fsf>