Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:11:13 GMT
From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: ports/157799: [PATCH] databases/ruby-bdb should use ${RUBY_RDOC} instead of calling rdoc directly
Message-ID: <201106121711.p5CHBDtN039303@red.freebsd.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <201106121720.p5CHK85w078165@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 157799
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: [PATCH] databases/ruby-bdb should use ${RUBY_RDOC} instead of calling rdoc directly
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Sun Jun 12 17:20:08 UTC 2011
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Steve Wills
>Release:
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
databases/ruby-bdb should use ${RUBY_RDOC} instead of calling rdoc directly. This will help with the ruby 1.9 transition. The attached patch fixes this.
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
Patch attached with submission follows:
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/databases/ruby-bdb/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -u -r1.62 Makefile
--- Makefile 22 Apr 2011 11:38:15 -0000 1.62
+++ Makefile 12 Jun 2011 17:05:49 -0000
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
post-build:
.if !defined(NOPORTDOCS)
( cd ${BUILD_WRKSRC}; ${SETENV} ${MAKE_ENV} ${MAKE} \
- ${MAKE_FLAGS} ${MAKEFILE} ${MAKE_ARGS} rdoc )
+ ${MAKE_FLAGS} ${MAKEFILE} ${MAKE_ARGS} ${RUBY_RDOC} )
.endif
post-install:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201106121711.p5CHBDtN039303>