Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Apr 2000 14:05:37 +1000 (EST)
From:      andrew@ugh.net.au
To:        Shawn Barnhart <swb@grasslake.net>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: tcpd in 4.0-stable
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004271402400.83786-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <022801bfaf85$abee8530$b8209fc0@marlowe>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Wed, 26 Apr 2000, Shawn Barnhart wrote:

> On a side note, if tcpd is in 4.0's base system, what included services are
> linked against libwrap?  portmap?  nfs?  sendmail?  It would nice if
> everything with that option was buildable with that option.

You can find out by running:

ldd `which <prog>`

inetd and portmap both are.

BTW this only works for dynamically linked executables...it appears nfsd
is static.

Andrew



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004271402400.83786-100000>