Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 23:06:41 +0200 From: Marc Fonvieille <fonvi@easynet.fr> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@freebsd.org> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELENG_4_3 calls itself -RELEASE? Message-ID: <20010803230641.A56183@gothic.blackend.org> In-Reply-To: <20010803125928M.jkh@freebsd.org>; from jkh@freebsd.org on Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 12:59:28PM -0700 References: <01080304302005.00395@spatula.home> <200108031605.f73G5bH65372@harmony.village.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20010803110818.021f6470@pop.schulte.org> <20010803125928M.jkh@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 12:59:28PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > I'm sold on either 4.4-BEET or 4.4-POSTRELEASE as a name for the > branch. Neither one really implies very much that isn't obvious in > the name itself. > Following many past threads i thought about one thing: what about changing 4.4-STABLE to 4.4-TRANS or 4.4-TRANSITIONAL ? and give STABLE name to RELENG_4_4 ? I understand that would be a big change, but maybe it would be more easy to everyone to understand what they run (RELEASE, STABLE, TRANSITIONAL or CURRENT) and make them more aware of what branch they track... (hmm TRACK can be a good name :) ). My 2 cents contribution... Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010803230641.A56183>