Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri,  3 Sep 1999 18:55:00 -0500
From:      Gerd Knops <gerti@bitart.com>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Vinum: Best performance from mirror setup with two disks
Message-ID:  <19990903235501.9687.qmail@camelot.bitart.com>
In-Reply-To: <19990904090824.Y95378@freebie.lemis.com>
References:  <19990903232137.9612.qmail@camelot.bitart.com> <19990904090824.Y95378@freebie.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Friday,  3 September 1999 at 18:21:36 -0500, Gerd Knops wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have read everything I could find about vinum (man pages, recent
> > questions Mailing list, Vinum intro) but I am still not quite sure:
> >
> > What is the best performing setup to get mirroring with two disks?
> >
> > I understand that I just set up one plex per disk. Write performance goes
> > down due to double writes, read performance goes up since vinum will
> > alternate reads between the plexis.
>
> Correct.
>
> > What I don't quite understand is if striping gives me an added advantage
> > in this scenario.
>
> It depends a lot on your usage.  In general, a striped plex will give
> more even access to the two drives, so the performance is likely to be
> better.
>
I still don't get that. In the case of a two disk mirror, how can striping  
help performance if reads are already alternated between the two plexes  
(which are on different disks)?

Gerd


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990903235501.9687.qmail>