Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:11:45 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Antonio Gonz?lez Castro <agoca80@gmail.com>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> Subject: Re: RFC: C version of devd daemon. Message-ID: <48302.1244830305@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:09:06 MST." <20090612180906.GA12679@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20090612180906.GA12679@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Steve Kargl w rites: >Yes, I know in a year or two clang will compile C++. And, >yes, I know that groff and libstdc++ require a C++ compiler. >The difference is that devd is required for a functioning >system while neither groff nor libstdc++[1] would be required. It's a tough call, isn't it ? How about making the C-version devd an option (WITH_C_DEVD ?) or possibly a port ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48302.1244830305>