Date: Fri, 8 Nov 1996 11:33:14 +0100 (MET) From: torstenb@solar.tlk.com (Torsten Blum) To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com (Andreas Klemm) Cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com, se@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Need "a" ghostscript Message-ID: <m0vLoFO-000HzCC@solar.tlk.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.961107213152.10779B-100000@klemm.gtn.com> from Andreas Klemm at "Nov 7, 96 09:35:05 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andreas Klemm wrote: > I think we could remove ghostscript 2.6.2 and 3.x port. gs4 seems > pretty stable. No need to keep several versions like with tcl/tk. > > Does somebody have something against removal of gs2 and gs3 port ?! gs2 has a different licence than gs3 and gs4. (gs4 restricts commercial redistribution). We should keep at least gs2 (IMHO) -tb
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0vLoFO-000HzCC>