Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 12:17:41 -0600 (CST) From: Johan A. van Zanten <johan@giantfoo.org> To: mj@mjturner.net Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netra T1-200 debugging Message-ID: <20081106.121741.1300526614.johan@giantfoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20081106173311.GH25025@aurora.pimp.org.za> References: <20081104.192013.179942973.johan@giantfoo.org> <oq4p2mc82s.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET> <20081106173311.GH25025@aurora.pimp.org.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael-John Turner <mj@mjturner.net> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 01:59:39PM -0500, Miles Nordin wrote: > > interesting, though, that it's the only one with a big cache. > > There may also be the odd mistake in the cache info - My T1 AC200 has > 1024KiB cache, not the 256KiB listed in the table. > > Running NetBSD 4.0: > cpu0 at mainbus0: SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIe @ 500 MHz, UPA id 0 > cpu0: 32K instruction (32 b/l), 16K data (32 b/l), 1024K external (64 > b/l) I think i based my info on this: http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/Netra_T1_AC200_shared/spec I'll add your info. -johan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081106.121741.1300526614.johan>