Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:17:58 +0100
From:      Charles Sibbald <casibbald@gmail.com>
To:        Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net>
Cc:        "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Raspberry PI ARM Clone
Message-ID:  <DD46896B-2608-4F62-A697-353C89518C63@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120428210743.abfe513d.ray@ddteam.net>
References:  <CAKYBmwD6QgZ%2BqUVeSTkSUtO7Rf=iNPXPehA_owjwsa7FUShv2A@mail.gmail.com> <20120428210743.abfe513d.ray@ddteam.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I see it as a generic base for affordable embedded computing that covers the=
 most useful corner cases. For example one potential customer wants a vehicl=
e tracking system together with delivery reporting etc. The vision for this b=
oard is to do for computers what clone ATX boards provided, a strong general=
 base to build on. I do believe we can get the same volumes as the PI with a=
 more complete board.

Sent from my iPhone

On 28 Apr 2012, at 19:07, Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net> wrote:

> On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:09:25 +0100
> Charles Sibbald <casibbald@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
>> Hello Folks,
>>=20
>> I have had discussions with some friends about the possibility of a
>> high spec 'clone' of the PI and this has brought us to the list at the
>> bottom of the page.
>>=20
>> We have been in discussions with a PCB designer and expect we can
>> produce this with a retail price of under US$100.
>>=20
>=20
> Very cool.
>=20
>> Does anyone have any comments on this idea, what would be the interest
>> in such a spec board?
>>=20
>> On advantage we have is that we will have an agreement with chipset
>> manufacturers for access to necessary information for the BSD
>> community to develop drivers.
>>=20
>=20
> Documentation of Samsung SoC is not open?
>=20
>> Processor
>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> Cortex-A8 1.5GHz Dual Core Samsung SOC
>>=20
>> Display
>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> RCA video,
>=20
> Maybe better to not add RCA connectors at all to make device smaller?
>=20
>> Mini-HDMI,
>> LCD ribbon connector,
>> Sound
>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> Mini-Audio 2.5mm Mic & Speaker Out ports
>> RAM & Storage
>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> 1GB RAM on board,
>> Mini-SD card slot,
>> Networking
>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> LAN 2 x 10/100,
>> 802.11b/g/n onboard,
>> Bluetooth onboard,
>> GSM/GPRS (Single modem)
>> Connectivity
>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> Mini-USB 3 Ports,
>> Amtel ATxmega Microcontroller 100 GPIO pins
>> Camera pins,
>> InfraRed pins,
>> Sensors
>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> Gyro sensor,
>> G-Sensor,
>> Digital compass,
>> GPS and Accelerometer
>> Antenna
>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>> GSM Antenna,
>> Bluetooth Antenna,
>> Wifi Antenna,
>=20
> Unless it for PDA like device, better to remove sensors, Bluetooth,
> GPS. That will allow lower price and smaller size.
>=20
> But anyway, looks very interesting.
> Thank you very much!
>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>=20
> WBW
> --=20
> Aleksandr Rybalko <ray@ddteam.net>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DD46896B-2608-4F62-A697-353C89518C63>