Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 18:28:03 -0500 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Bob Johnson <stest033@garbonzo.hos.ufl.edu>, stable@freebsd.org, doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS? Message-ID: <20021119182803.L8853@papagena.rockefeller.edu> In-Reply-To: <3DDA90CD.387D6C9A@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters wrote: > > The FreeBSD documentation > > specifically recommended running -stable in a production > > environment. > > That was before the release branches were created. If the handbook > fails to recommend the most up-to-date branch now, it most definitely > should be corrected. Would you like to research this and write a > PR if necessary? The handbook does not say this and hasn't for quite a while. It in fact recommends *against* tracking -stable if you only want to track security fixes. I think it puts things quite accurately: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html - Rahul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021119182803.L8853>