Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Jul 1997 18:07:52 GMT
From:      Adam David <adam@veda.is>
To:        ada@not-enough.bandwidth.ORG (Ada T Lim)
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: nn-current / nn ports
Message-ID:  <199707301807.SAA08004@ubiq.veda.is>
References:  <199707261126.VAA05352@polya.blah.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Just a note to mention that it appears that the MASTER_SITE
>for nn and nn-current appears to have changed slightly:

>it is now at ftp.uwa.edu.au/pub/nn/old/ and old/beta

Does it mean that nn itself is considered old or is there a new nn happening?
If the latter, might that not rather be worth pursuing? It would seem to make
better sense updating the port than adjusting it to still fetch obsolete files.

Oh, the new nn is done in tk, whee! Better keep the old nn port around then,
but perhaps nn-current can be replaced by tk-nn.

--
Adam David <adam@veda.is>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707301807.SAA08004>