Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:41:39 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 243370] TRYBROKEN equivalent for ONLY_FOR_ARCHS and NOT_FOR_ARCHS Message-ID: <bug-243370-7788-0Wus9xV22A@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-243370-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-243370-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243370 --- Comment #6 from Mark Linimon <linimon@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Mathieu Arnold from comment #3) > portmgr's job is to maintain the framework and curate the ports tree. We= mark ports BROKEN when they have been failing to build for months. As pkubaj says, unless maintainers have a easy way to test on BROKEN_ARCH #= n, they most likely won't. And, we have never made it a requirement for them = to do so. IMHO portmgr running (quarterly?) TRYBROKEN runs on various architectures is something we should do. OTOH that discussion is probably not within the sc= ope of a PR. If desired, I can start a thread on ports-developers@ or suchlike. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243370-7788-0Wus9xV22A>