Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:58:18 +0000
From:      Dan Moschuk <dm@globalserve.net>
To:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NFS - Will it ever be fixed?
Message-ID:  <19990322125817.A60019@globalserve.net>
In-Reply-To: <199903220752.XAA16629@apollo.backplane.com>; from Matthew Dillon on Sun, Mar 21, 1999 at 11:52:11PM -0800
References:  <199903212136.QAA05306@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> <199903220752.XAA16629@apollo.backplane.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>     IRIX doesn't have the best NFS implementation in the world, at least
>     not when we were using it a year or two ago (IRIX 6.2ish).
> 
>     Solaris is the benchmark NFS implementation that most people test
>     their stuff on.
> 
>     For FreeBSD, the problem with NFS stems from a crappy initial 
>     implementation.  Fixing it is not easy, though we are making progress.
>     Rewriting it is out of the question... nobody has that kind of time
>     and it would be several man-months worth of work.
> 
>     					-Matt
> 					Matthew Dillon 
> 					<dillon@backplane.com>

Interesting enough, a client that I do contract work for is willing to pay 
me for 50 hours of time to fix up FreeBSD's NFS implementation.  That's a
pretty big penny.

I expect I'd be starting this mid-April.

Regards,
-- 
Dan Moschuk (TFreak!dm@globalserve.net)
Senior Systems/Network Administrator
Globalserve Communications Inc., a Primus Canada Company
"If at first you don't succeed, redefine success"



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990322125817.A60019>