Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:03:36 +0100 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Adding portsnap to the base system Message-ID: <20050807190336.GF55885@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <42F62C5F.6000609@freebsd.org> References: <42F62C5F.6000609@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--fpolVoprVozDR81Y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 08:44:31AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > I've been told by a committer that there hasn't been enough > discussion about the merits of adding portsnap to the base > system. <snip> > Discuss. Portsnap rocks. Please do. I *would* like to see the server side bits that build the snaps, but that doesn't necessarily have to be in the FreeBSD tree. Ceri --=20 Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.) --fpolVoprVozDR81Y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC9lsIocfcwTS3JF8RAicoAJ9qN059Dfc4Fy6mH9mFy4AC6y5OGgCgv55o GAEeo/scdyOA7uRj7atdKaY= =dpJh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fpolVoprVozDR81Y--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050807190336.GF55885>