Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 12:17:16 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: Ken Key <key@network-alchemy.com>, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Here is what IBM thinks about using FreeBSD on their newer Thinkpads Message-ID: <200011291917.MAA21668@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 29 Nov 2000 10:35:08 MST." <14885.15948.729037.110372@nomad.yogotech.com> References: <14885.15948.729037.110372@nomad.yogotech.com> <200011290551.eAT5pJF28047@mass.osd.bsdi.com> <200011291710.JAA88193@sodium.cips.nokia.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <14885.15948.729037.110372@nomad.yogotech.com> Nate Williams writes: : Didn't Robert shrink it back to 1 sector after 4.1 was released? It : would be interesting to know if the 'smaller' bootblock worked as well. Yes, he did. : (The box we're using is an A20, so it may be different from the A21 : problem..) Could be. FreeBSD has only been using the 165 partition type for about 9 years now. Maybe that's why they were confused. Also, does anybody know if dangerously dedicated works :-) Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011291917.MAA21668>