Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 12:30:23 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: marino@freebsd.org Cc: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r395079 - in head/graphics: . mitsuba mitsuba/files Message-ID: <20150826123023.GA114@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <55DDAB81.2030302@marino.st> References: <201508230856.t7N8uwal009338@repo.freebsd.org> <96D957F8044D8B647B259802@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20150824070915.GA15244@FreeBSD.org> <20150824084807.GA93486@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150824090104.GB93486@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150824094539.GA77434@FreeBSD.org> <20150824102328.GC93486@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150826114234.GA78599@FreeBSD.org> <55DDAB81.2030302@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:05:21PM +0200, John Marino wrote: > Unfortunately they should expect full out breakage immediately and count > every day that works beyond EOL as a bonus. > > IMO, any expectation of "slow-death bitrot" after EOL is unrealistic and > maybe we would do people a better service of dispelling this notion > rather than perpetuating it. FWIW I don't support removing EOL support > actively (as the only change) but do think it should be removed when > coupled with other maintenance and not just left because it still works > in theory. Well, fair enough. Time to get back to coding. :) ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150826123023.GA114>