Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:38:31 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: soralx@cydem.org Cc: talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports system woes Message-ID: <1206963511.25210.26.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <20080331010057.51d2015d@soralx> References: <20080326131800.GA75243@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20080326135806.M17639@FreeBSD.org> <20080331010057.51d2015d@soralx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-yllkDY8kAZt0OdY4zIOK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
soralx@cydem.org p=ED=B9e v po 31. 03. 2008 v 01:00 -0700:
> for all this GNOME/GTK stuff? Insane, I say. Look at the depndencies fiel=
d
> for `make search` results -- atrocious. How often do you care about a por=
t
> depending on xproto, Xlib, x..., instead of just Xorg?
Actually there's an ongoing effort to change ports to depend only on the
Xorg pieces that are actually needed, instead on the whole bowl.
> Since nothing can be done about it, how about placing all the packages
> that constitute base of Xorg into a separate directory in /var/db/pkg/ ?
I don't see how that would simplify anything. /var/db/pkg is not ment to
be user friendly.
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Pilot to Co-Pilot: Boo.
--=-yllkDY8kAZt0OdY4zIOK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD)
iEYEABECAAYFAkfwzTcACgkQntdYP8FOsoI8OACfQLW7w5UdgeqO0oycCMldSgx9
uP4AoKVJKDeMAgYbIuS5FDh0DNcIcJm6
=fFK7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-yllkDY8kAZt0OdY4zIOK--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1206963511.25210.26.camel>