Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 21:00:29 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/dd args.c dd.c dd.h Message-ID: <p05101519b8adca9e5728@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20020307170140.A68865@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20020307035232.A67494@hub.freebsd.org> <200203071216.g27CGMRV010209@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20020307151333.A72218@hub.freebsd.org> <20020307233110.GA1462@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <xzpofhz287x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020307170140.A68865@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 5:01 PM -0800 3/7/02, David O'Brien wrote: >On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 01:50:42AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >> David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> writes: >> > I've even actually found a few real bugs while checking with the >> > gcc3 warns stuff. A couple of things in usr.bin modify things more >> > than once between sequence points! >> >> How close are we to pull the switch on gcc? And is there a >> (relatively) simple way to do this locally for testing purposes? > >Far. I am only dealing with gcc3 as it applies to porting to new >architectures [..etc..] > >That said, I believe the x86 people can wait a little bit longer >and let the Sparc64, IA-64, and x86_64 platforms drive this [..etc..] > >For those that cannot wait, there is the gcc-devel port (very soon >to be gcc31 port). Tsk, tsk. You missed the perfect opportunity to say, "buy a cheap sparc and test everything on that!" :-) :-) -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05101519b8adca9e5728>