Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 21:16:36 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Import libyaml into base Message-ID: <CAF6rxgn=eUqZQpjHvSAs81zGmUJOd9S-NjC5sPtAd6vobkE8vQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130304195607.4823f548@kan.dyndns.org> References: <20130302165239.GB27078@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAC8HS2HKBRc-%2B93p--f-0u8jOm9xJKb6dC1D3rwSL9dTbARGxw@mail.gmail.com> <20130304195607.4823f548@kan.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4 March 2013 19:56, Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> wrote: > We dealt with this in the past by renaming the library that goes into > the base to be something else than its upstream variant, witness > libbsdxml. Should this be done to libyaml-in-base as well? This was done as "libbsdyml" -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgn=eUqZQpjHvSAs81zGmUJOd9S-NjC5sPtAd6vobkE8vQ>