Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:25:50 +0530
From:      Venkat Duvvuru <venkatduvvuru.ml@gmail.com>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: MSI-X limitation in freebsd 8.2
Message-ID:  <CAGdae7YSKf=vqCO0EvsFcg9nysmnRFMbv%2BXj8chBW62uoKHFFQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201206210947.30171.jhb@freebsd.org>
References:  <CAGdae7YW0jt4gTmHufHFTrcdtFGhngu_Wi%2BMDg1nY_T0J1C_SQ@mail.gmail.com> <201206210816.22774.jhb@freebsd.org> <CAGdae7Yum_MP99kSK1Xi8z02APnZPoXFKR22fTuE5tiuorYMhw@mail.gmail.com> <201206210947.30171.jhb@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This setup has variety of NICs, Intel's, Emulex's and all are stock drivers.

/Venkat

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:17 PM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Thursday, June 21, 2012 8:50:06 am Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
> > While I'm able to ping to the machine..every command on the current
> active
> > session is sluggish infact doesn't complete, unable to open another ssh
> > session..an already opened ssh session doesn't react which is running
> > "systat -vmstat"...
> >
> > The only thing I could do is to successfully complete "top -P" command
> > once..even top hung for the second time.
>
> Hmm, is this a stock FreeBSD driver or an out-of-tree NIC driver?
>
> > /Venkat
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:46 PM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, June 21, 2012 5:47:48 am Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
> > > > John - Thanks for the reply.
> > > >
> > > > All the CPUs are ~100% idle. I don't see any interrupt storm on any
> of
> > > the
> > > > irqs (vmstat -i).
> > > >
> > > > One observation I made is that I see messages like these in dmesg
> > > >
> > > > ===> mem
> > > 0xfaf60000-0xfaf7ffff,0xfaf40000-0xfaf5ffff,0xfaf1c000-0xfaf1ffff
> > > > irq 40 at device 0.1 on pci6
> > > >
> > > > Looking at the irq value I think it is the INTx irq range which
> shouldn't
> > > > have probably got allocated as the device is msix capable and there
> are
> > > > vectors allocated for these devices in the range (256-380).
> > > >
> > > > Could this be a problem?
> > >
> > > No, that line is output before the driver's attach routine is run, so
> it
> > > will
> > > always show INTx IRQ value even if it isn't used.
> > >
> > > > The scenario where I am hitting this problem is a setup with 4 NICs,
> each
> > > > NIC with two ports and each port using up 4 msix vectors. The system
> is
> > > > fine till some ports are up but once I ifup the 5th port, the system
> > > > becomes sluggish.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure whether all the 30 vectors are from a single cpu..I
> don't
> > > know
> > > > how to get that information.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately there isn't an easy way.  I have this gdb script which
> can
> > > display it from kgdb on x86:
> > >
> > > define irqs
> > >    set $e = event_list->tqh_first
> > >    while ($e != 0)
> > >        if ($e->ie_source != 0 && $e->ie_handlers.tqh_first != 0)
> > >            set $src = (struct intsrc *)$e->ie_source
> > >            if ($src->is_pic->pic_enable_source ==
> &ioapic_enable_source)
> > >                set $_cpu = ((struct ioapic_intsrc *)$src)->io_cpu
> > >            else
> > >                if ($src->is_pic->pic_enable_source ==
> &msi_enable_source)
> > >                    set $_cpu = ((struct msi_intsrc *)$src)->msi_cpu
> > >                else
> > >                    set $_cpu = 0
> > >                end
> > >            end
> > >            printf "CPU %d: %s\n", $_cpu, $e->ie_fullname
> > >        end
> > >        set $e = $e->ie_list.tqe_next
> > >    end
> > > end
> > >
> > > document irqs
> > > Dump list of IRQs with associated CPU.
> > > end
> > >
> > > However, unless the driver is using BUS_BIND_IRQ() or you are using
> cpuset
> > > -x,
> > > the interrupts should be round-robin assigned among CPUs.
> > >
> > > What exactly do you mean by sluggish?  Trying to interact with the box
> over
> > > SSH is sluggish?  Is there a change in RTT if you are pinging the box,
> is
> > > there a change in performance of TCP or UDP streams to/from the box?
> > >
> > > --
> > > John Baldwin
> > >
> >
>
> --
> John Baldwin
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGdae7YSKf=vqCO0EvsFcg9nysmnRFMbv%2BXj8chBW62uoKHFFQ>