Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 20:27:34 +0200 (MET DST) From: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: C2 Trusted FreeBSD? Message-ID: <199710141827.UAA16499@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: Terry Lambert's message of Tue, 14 Oct 1997 12:40:04 %2B0000 (GMT) References: <199710140424.XAA17794@nospam.hiwaay.net> <199710141240.FAA01458@usr02.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cc:'s moved to -chat. > > > Remember, for the most part we're talking about security specs brought to > > you by the same government that would limit cryptography to key escrow > > techniques. > > The FBI web page has a link explaining their position: legally obtained > wire taps. > > I can't help thinking that, even though this doesn't violate search > and seizure (since wire taps a re performed with due process of law, > needing a court order), it probably violates compelling one to > testify against oneself. According to my recent reading (probably in Wired) they wanted to drop that boring 'court order' part and go with only needing a subpoena... Eivind.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710141827.UAA16499>