Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:34:34 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one Message-ID: <20110421003434.GA18338@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <977321498.379779.1303337662533.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <20110415140435.GA4278@icarus.home.lan> <977321498.379779.1303337662533.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 06:14:22PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > > - Has the experimental code been stress-tested? If so, how? I've heard > > of people doing silly things like testing with filesystem benchmark > > utilities -- which pass/work fine, but the instant someone tries > > using something like rsnapshot (like we do), the thing falls apart. > > > Just fyi, Peter Holms (pho@) has volunteered to do some stress testing, > which is now in progress. > > Thanks go to him for doing this, rick Totally awesome. Thank you both for doing this -- I can probably safely speak for the community when I say we all appreciate it. :-) Also, related yet unrelated: our production environment is running the experimental server as of ~48 hours ago, and things seem okay. Our rsync jobs have all passed w/out issue, no anomalies. The stablerestart(5) stuff needs to get dealt with before the switch-to experimental-server-as-default gets flipped on, but I know you'll get to that, Rick. If you need any testing/help from me, just let me know. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110421003434.GA18338>