Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 01:19:16 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Igor Sysoev <is@rambler-co.ru> Cc: Max Khon <fjoe@samodelkin.net> Subject: Re: "netstat -m" and sendfile(2) statistics in STABLE Message-ID: <20040618011745.W72823@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20040618094356.O22477@is.park.rambler.ru> References: <20040618094356.O22477@is.park.rambler.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Igor Sysoev wrote: > Hi, > > I read objections in cvs-all@ about netstat's output after MFC > of sendfile(2) statistics. > > How about "netstat -ms" ? > > Right now this switch combination is treated as simple "-m" in both -STABLE > and -CURRENT. > > > Igor Sysoev > http://sysoev.ru/en/ I would prefer that sfbufs statistics either be kept in netstat -m, OR added to an entirely different program (perhaps vmstat). Making yet another netstat flag just because we're scared of confusing users is a noble compromise, but will in the end just make things more confusing. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040618011745.W72823>