Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:23:49 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Jonathan Franks <daemon@taconic.net> Cc: Erik Osterholm <freebsd-lists-erik@erikosterholm.org>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: www search engines Message-ID: <20080207091923.Y22656@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <EB95F834-7851-4AA0-8393-D8A1771A6254@taconic.net> References: <20080206004405.M9353@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <47A9B6AB.30505@pixelhammer.com> <20080206152432.W3704@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080207000706.GA19437@aleph.cepheid.org> <EB95F834-7851-4AA0-8393-D8A1771A6254@taconic.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> >> Then there's the issue of spam and spam blocking. Google does a great >> job of blocking spam. even better. it blocks ligitimate e-mail very efficiently. for them - legitimate - means coming from the "wheel of friends" which means all other "free" huge services. everything else may pass, or may not, who knows. of course it's not just gmail problem, but all of it's "friends" too, and - quite often - of smaller mail services. using spamassassin as antispam looks safe (i'm using it quite long), using automatic IP-based blockers are bad. spamassassin weights probability of being spam giving point. when it classifies mail badly by one rule, and well by others it still does the good job.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080207091923.Y22656>