Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 20:32:25 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: Daniel Lang <dl@leo.org> Cc: hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rsync or cvsup? Message-ID: <20040603003225.GA22457@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> In-Reply-To: <20040602122709.GC72313@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> References: <40BD8E7A.12894.2D858552@localhost> <20040602122709.GC72313@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 02:27:10PM +0200, Daniel Lang wrote:
> Dan Langille wrote on Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:23:22AM -0400:
> > cvsup.nz.freebsd.org is being replaced. We are trying to set up the
> > new box now.
> >
> > At present, it cvsup's from cvsup-master.freebsd.org. Is the latest
> > thinking to use rsync or cvsup?
> [..]
>
> CVSup. For the CVS-Repo use cvsup. I didn't even know that
> rsync was offered on cvsup-master....
>
It's not. :-)
You can choose between cvsup/rsync for mirroring the FTP site. On
ftp-master.freebsd.org we do prefer people use CVSup if possible because
it is less of a memory hog than rsync is. Peter was right about the
size (it's gone up since then) though we do allow 8 connects, not 1. ;-)
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040603003225.GA22457>