Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:44:32 +0300 From: abi@abinet.ru To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: xfce - confusing rights to shutdown without polkit rules Message-ID: <ac856428946d40e033ba48d7d8de82f1@abinet.ru>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, I have something mysterious on my installation. I reinstalled, but I still have the issue. xfce4-session states that I must write ck rules to get rights for reboot and shutdown. However, I have all rights (reboot, shutdown, suspend hibernate) without any rules at all. All I need is start session with --with-ck-launch. My user has no additional predefined groups and after reinstall I have xfce only. Maybe I decade :) ago, I remember that ck rules was mandatory. What I'm missing ? I feel frustrated - it's the first time FreeBSD game me more rights, not less =/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 13:57:02 2016 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC6DBC21DE for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: from h2.pinyon.org (h2.pinyon.org [65.101.5.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41D321CCC for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:57:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 58) id 33A0936D43; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:56:55 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1471960615; bh=X/S6GG/ZJmSF6bODMtlQVu571AcuZpFfYocrs+JtEnI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=p5cxsp8Cg1hAHNBq+cWG3dwbAPqSv5gCiQ73bR8NlIJT0eUpm3zU5wLtkgShw7eFx /p8RJNms+CwTWA/RT1wBLMmxxDP4K/26gldgT4VK/Js5soLDu4vfEUSo3314vPn94z exTECswfgfmwYWCLKTILZisSeNruhyepeLtUFCcY= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on h2.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from [10.0.10.15] (h4.esturion.net [65.101.5.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57F4836D36 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:56:54 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1471960614; bh=X/S6GG/ZJmSF6bODMtlQVu571AcuZpFfYocrs+JtEnI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Q4evbA9PGRmfRnFlZNFC0fCnQxv9SiX4FVbsg69GLgLvBWeytEVT3Gleidy5yEtiK Md6+sKe1CzB/CU6VaLkAaeuUIKr60p8ZuOJblip1StJdAQ313/tIWXtsdsHMafEnCu 6v9Bhymr7oUs8+PwqiK26KqZGvqQwY+X4qWqFcZk= Subject: Re: fontconfig update uglifies fonts To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <729af4af-0ed3-4d45-2e68-b4483e08110a@pinyon.org> <20160823024147.GB84554@kyleck.sig11.fr> From: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@pinyon.org> Message-ID: <a4a99f27-8f8c-c122-935f-63f0dfd7d8cb@pinyon.org> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:56:53 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160823024147.GB84554@kyleck.sig11.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:57:02 -0000 On 08/22/16 19:41, Pierre Guinoiseau wrote: > Hi, > > can I suggest replacing Bitstream Vera with DejaVu? Bitstream Vera fonts > have been unmaintained for more than 12 years and have a lot of hinting > issues, whereas DejaVu fonts are a very popular and well maintained fork > of them and have a very nice hinting. It might fix your issue and you > won't notice the difference. Ok, thank you for the suggestion. My how the years fly by. I now have DejaVu running in emacs and it's not bad, but not quite as good as Bitstream Vera. If it solves the other font issues I can live with it. I'm in the middle of bringing up 11/stable and then I have to rebuild 1000+ ports so I'll start back again on fonts (sigh) if I need to once that's done. Best, Russell > Cheers, > Pierre > > On 2016-08-22 17:01:33, Russell L. Carter <rcarter@pinyon.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 10/stable amd64, the recent fontconfig update makes the fonts used >> in thunderbird, firefox, (u)xterm, and emacs quite a bit uglier. The >> font strokes seem to be thicker and fuzzier. Emacs I fixed by >> reinstalling bitstream-vera, but (u)xterm use that and they're still >> broken. I ran fc-cache -f, but no change. I turned off antialiasing >> via /usr/local/etc/fonts/local.conf and that made the strokes nice and >> thin but overall even uglier. >> >> Any ideas/pointers on how to fix this? >> >> Thanks, >> Russell >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ac856428946d40e033ba48d7d8de82f1>