Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:51:24 -0600
From:      "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PATCH for a more-POSIX `ps', and related adventures
Message-ID:  <20040325145124.GB61830@madman.celabo.org>
In-Reply-To: <p0602045dbc84dd541b11@[128.113.24.47]>
References:  <p06020448bc824de07ab9@[128.113.24.47]> <20040322155901.GA17891@stack.nl> <p0602045dbc84dd541b11@[128.113.24.47]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 01:18:22PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> Great.  So what should I do here?

I dunno.  Add a completely POSIX compliant ps command into
/usr/posix ?  Or replace /usr/bin/ps with a completely POSIX
compliant ps and move our traditional one to /usr/ucb? :-)

Seriously, we should give some hard thought into how to
provide/migrate to a POSIX compatible utilities environment.  It's
been discussed on the lists before, but I still believe providing
POSIX compatible versions of utilities on a separate path is the only
clean way to make this happen.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040325145124.GB61830>